Skechers Shape-Ups vs Reebok – Comfort & Performance Clash!

With so many athletic shoe options today, it’s tough to decide between trendy brands like Skechers Shape Ups and Reebok.

How do their technologies and designs compare for real-world comfort?

As a wear-tester and footwear reviewer, I’ll break down the distinguishing factors between Skechers Shape-Ups vs Reebok trainers and sneakers. Let’s dig in!

Skechers Shape-Ups vs Reebok

The main difference between Skechers Shape Ups and Reebok shoes is that Shape Ups utilize a curved rocker sole to gently shift weight while walking, toning muscles in the process, whereas Reebok uses stabilized cushioning for shock absorption and supportive comfort.

Shape Ups prioritize a rolling motion to engage muscles passively, while Reebok focuses on stability and responsiveness to energize active workouts.

Before comparing the specifics, here is an overview of Skechers Shape Ups vs Reebok Shoes:

Feature	Skechers Shape-ups	Reebok EasyTone
Rocker Sole	Soft kinetic wedge midsole curves at heel/toe	Balance ball construction moves independently underneath
Cushioning	Good shock absorption from midsole foam	Less overall cushioning compared to Shape-ups
Muscle Engagement	Promotes some toning benefits while walking	Focuses more on toning/balance while standing and walking
Stability	Unstable rocker sole design	Balance ball moves more underneath to engage muscles
Uppers	Mesh fabric & leather/synthetic overlays	Mesh or leather with overlays
Width Options	Medium or wide widths	Medium width mostly
Ideal User	Seeking decent toning and comfort	Seeking maximum muscle activation
Ease of Use	Relatively easy to walk in after short break-in period	Can take time getting used to balance balls moving underfoot
Durability Issues	Some excess midsole compression over time	Balance balls prone to flattening eventually
Price Point	$$	$$$

In summary, Skechers provides a curved rocker profile for decent toning results during everyday walking activities, while Reebok pioneered an unsteady sole with moving parts below to fully maximize muscle engagement at the expense of comfort. Reebok tends to carry a higher price tag as well.

You May Also Like:
Skechers Shape-Ups vs New Balance

Pros and Cons

Pros: Skechers Shape-Ups

• Designed to help tone and strengthen leg muscles
• Rocker-bottom sole promotes better posture and balance
• Available in a variety of styles and colors
• Relatively affordable compared to some other toning shoes

Cons: Skechers Shape-Ups

• Mixed reviews on effectiveness of toning claims
• Some users report discomfort or instability when first wearing
• Potentially not as suitable for high-impact activities
• Brand not as widely recognized as Reebok

Pros: Reebok

• Long history and reputation in the fitness and athletic shoe market
• Wide range of shoes for different activities and training needs
• Known for comfort, stability, and support
• Some models focused on toning and strengthening

Cons: Reebok

• May not be as focused on toning and strengthening as Skechers Shape-Ups
• Some models can be more expensive than Skechers
• Brand recognition may lead to higher expectations that not all models meet
• Fewer style options compared to Skechers Shape-Ups

Which Shoes Are Good for Different Activities

Shoes for Running

• Reebok makes a variety of running-specific shoes that are generally better suited for running than Skechers Shape-Ups. Reebok uses high-performance cushioning and stability features designed for the demands of running.
• The rounded “rocker” sole of the Skechers Shape-Ups is not optimal for efficient running form and can feel unstable at faster paces.
• Independent studies have found that Reebok running shoes provide better shock absorption and energy return compared to the Skechers Shape-Up design during running.

Shoes for Walking

• The Skechers Shape-Ups are a better option than standard Reebok walking shoes for walking. The rounded sole and built-in instability forces the wearer to engage more muscles, potentially improving posture and balance.
• This increased muscle activation can lead to improved muscle tone and calorie burn during walking with Skechers Shape-Ups.
• However, the instability can also cause fatigue more quickly compared to a more stable walking shoe like some Reebok models designed specifically for walking.

Shoes for Standing All Day

• Skechers Shape-Ups excel for standing all day due to the rocker sole and balance-enhancing design.
• The increased muscle engagement helps reduce strain on the joints, back, and feet compared to flat-soled shoes like many Reebok models.
• Reebok does make some shoes with additional cushioning and support features for standing, but the Skechers Shape-Ups are specifically engineered for this purpose.

Now that you have an overview of Skechers Shape Ups vs Reebok Shoes differences, read on for an in-depth feature-by-feature comparison.

A Look at the Brands and their Shoes

First, an overview of what defines these two athletic footwear labels:

Feature	Skechers Shape Ups	Reebok
Founded	1992	1895
Key Technologies	Kinetic Wedge midsole, DynaMic sensors, Microwobbleboard cushioning	DMX Shear cushioning, SweetFoam+, Energy Web cage, Floatride foam
Core Focus	Toning/walking shoes engineered to improve posture, engage muscles, absorb shock	Versatile athletic footwear built for performance, stability, and all-day wear
Category Range	Walking, running, training, work	Running, training, CrossFit, walking, classics

While Skechers started by exclusively making utility chunky walking shoes like Shape Ups, they’ve since expanded into lifestyle and performance shoes.

Comparatively, Reebok has an extensive heritage of providing athletic footwear across training disciplines, so offers a wider range of categories.

Now let’s see how models from both brands stack up across the variables most affecting fit and comfort.

Shoe Construction and Material Comparison

Skechers and Reebok take distinct approaches when crafting uppers, midsoles, and outsoles:

Feature	Skechers Shape Ups	Reebok
Uppers	Leather, mesh fabric, synthetic, wool knits	Mesh, synthetic, knitted textiles, NanoWeave
Midsoles	Patented Kinetic Wedge EVA, DynaMic sensors	DMX Shear air cushions, SweetFoam+, Floatride foam, Energy Web plate
Insoles	Fixed contoured arch support in-sock	Select styles have removable/replaceable insoles
Outsoles	High abrasion rubber	Durable rubber engineered for activity demands
Flexibility	Structured stability from rocker sole	Flexible multi-surface grooved outsoles for freedom of motion
Weight	11-13 oz average	9-12 oz average

A few noticeable differences:

• Skechers utilizes more traditional leather/mesh uppers while Reebok leans into woven fabrics for breathability
• Reebok midsoles offer options like targeted air cushioning or responsive Floatride foam vs. Skechers’ signature stabilized rocker wedge
• Reebok allows greater outsole flexibility for dynamic movement compared to Skechers’ rigid curved walking sole

So how do these elements come together on foot for walking and running utility?

You May Also Like:
Skechers Shape-Ups vs FitFlops

Size & Width Comparison

The way athletic shoes fit can majorly impact performance comfort, so let’s compare sizing across models:

Feature	Skechers Shape Ups	Reebok
Fit	Curved sole hugs arches; toe box suits average to slightly wide feet	Range of anatomical fits from precision snug to relaxed roomy
Size	Runs true to size	Runs true to size
Width	Wide and extra wide available for select women’s styles; wide and extra wide available for select men’s styles	Multiple widths like narrow, standard, and wide offered based on style
Length	Order standard size	Consider sizing up or down depending on the desired toe room

The key takeaway is that both Skechers and Reebok run true to size overall with options accommodating wider feet.

However, Reebok offers greater size and width variance for really dialing in ideal toe box room, forefoot fit, and adjusting snugness through the midfoot.

Cushioning and Responsiveness Comparison

Do these shoes provide soft comfort for all-day wear or responsive bounce for PRs? Details:

Feature	Skechers Shape Ups	Reebok
Cushioning	Maximum – highly padded	Ranges from minimal (Nano) to ultra-cushioned (Floatride Energy)
Responsiveness	Low – flat stabilized sole	Ranges from highly responsive (Fast Flexweave) to plush cushioned
Intended Activity	Moderate pace walking/light training	Full spectrum from leisurewear to intense training based on model
Heel Drop	Curved 1.25” heel	Options ranging from 0 mm (very low) to 12 mm (high heel drop)

Testimonials show Reebok extends across a wider spectrum from barefoot-feel responsive racers to plush runners. Skechers Shape Ups focuses exclusively on stable walking utility.

This means Reebok can better adapt models for both speed work and recovery days across running, CrossFit, boxing, dance, etc.

You May Also Like:
Skechers Shape-Ups vs MBT

Price Comparison

Given the brands’ core focuses differ, does this impact typical pricing?

Feature	Skechers Shape Ups	Reebok
MSRP Range	$80 – $120	$60 – $220
Average Discount Price	$60 – $100	$50 – $180
Prime Sales Season	Year-round	Seasonal model launches + holidays
Selection Breadth	~30 models	100s of models spanning categories
Frequency of Tech Updates	Gradual evolution	Frequent new style drops + limited editions

Shape Ups retail around the same price point as classic Reebok running and training shoes at full price. However, advanced Reebok performance models with tech like Floatride or DMX Shear cushioning reach up to $220 MSRP.

But during sales, prices come down on both brands making them even more affordable!

User Reviews and Ratings

Still debating Skechers vs Reebok for your needs? Here’s what wear testers report across comfort, support, style and durability:

Review Highlights	Skechers Shape Ups	Reebok
Ideal Use Case Ratings	Walking ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Running ⭐️⭐️⭐️ Training ⭐️⭐️	Running ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Training ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Walking ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Comfort	“The arch and heel support are perfectly tuned after break-in for all-day wear.” – Amanda L. “My knee pain went away switching to Shape-Ups!” – Andre G.	“The Floatride midsole gives me a plush bouncy feel I can run marathon distances on.” – Lauren F. “The Nano toe box is snug but gives me stability lifting.” – Steve R.
Style	“Trendy chunky walking shoe aesthetic while still performing.” – Anne J. “The knit wool uppers provide warmth and go with anything.” – Monica G.	“So many classic heritage styles but constantly pushing new colorways.” – Patrice W. “The Nano X1 let me design a custom colorway pair which is so cool.” – Jordan T.
Durability	“Rocker sole wore down after 1 year of daily walking commutes sadly.” – Sara K. “The upper materials show almost no signs of wear.” – Kim L.	“The outsole rubber seems to deteriorate quickly with pavement running.” – Andre D. “The all-fabric upper has held perfectly through heavy CrossFit use.” – Ashley U.

Reebok seems better equipped for dynamic athletic demands but Skechers earns high marks reinforcing comfortable walking utility and stability.

You May Also Like:
Skechers Shape-Ups vs Nike

Which is Better Suited For You?

Hopefully getting an insider’s look helps reveal which brand aligns best with your priorities:

Choose Skechers Shape Ups if you want:

👟 special curved sole walking technology to improve form

👟 reinforced cushioning and stability for moderate training

👟 extra roomy toe box suits wider feet

Go with Reebok if you need:

👟 athletic performance models specialized for running or CrossFit

👟 style versatility from classics to cutting-edge collaborations

👟 true customization integrating top footwear tech

Let your requirements drive you towards the engineered comfort walking or athletic training performance that matches your active lifestyle needs!

Conclusion

both Skechers Shape Ups and Reebok have carved out a niche in the toning shoe market with their proprietary technologies for enhancing muscle activation while walking.

Skechers uses a curved sole design called the Roc car that is intended to replicate a walking-on-sand effect, while Reebok uses balance pod inserts to create instability underfoot.

Both brands have sponsored research studies to validate the toning benefits of their shoes, with mixed results.

Independent studies have also had conflicting findings on whether these shoes truly activate leg muscles more so than regular shoes. More high-quality research would help clarify the potential fitness benefits..

Frequently Asked Questions

Share your love