I’ll conduct an in-depth feature face-off to help you determine if Skechers Foamies Arch Fit vs Crocs which better fit your lifestyle and pampered foot needs!
Skechers Foamies Arch Fit vs Crocs
The main difference between Skechers Foamies Arch Fit and Crocs shoes is that Arch Fit has medial arch support and is designed for high arches, while Crocs are made of lightweight, molded foam resin for cushioning and have ventilation ports but lack specialized arch support.
Arch Fit provides structure while Crocs prioritize ventilation and all-day comfort.
Before comparing the specifics, here is an overview of Skechers Foamies Arch Fit vs Crocs:
| Feature | Skechers Foamies Arch Fit | Crocs |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | Memory foam cushion insole | Croslite foam cushioning |
| Arch Support | Structured arch support | Moderate arch support |
| Outsole | Flexible foam traction | Slip-resistant Croslite |
| Toe Box | Roomy round toe | Roomy round toe |
| Material | Soft woven knit fabric | Croslite foam |
| Heel | Closed heel | Closed heel |
| Insoles | Removable insoles | Removable insoles |
| Style | Slip-on clogs & sandals | Clogs, sandals, slides |
| Usage Time | Short term wear | All day wear |
| Water Friendly | Not water friendly | Water friendly, easy to clean |
| Weight | Ultra lightweight | Ultra lightweight |
| Work Safety Certification | Not certified | Some styles certified |
| Washable | Not machine washable | Easy to clean |
| Odor Control | Lacks odor control | Antimicrobial odor control |
| Traction | Moderate traction | Slip resistant soles |
| Sizing | Runs small, size up | Runs large, size down |
In summary, the Foamies Arch Fit has better arch support while the Crocs have more style options and water/odor resistance.
The Foamies are only for short term wear while Crocs excel for all day comfort.
You May Also Like:
Skechers Foamies vs Crocs Clogs
Pros and Cons
Pros: Skechers Foamies Arch Fit
- Ultra-lightweight and comfortable foam construction
- Incorporates enhanced arch support and footbed technology
- Relatively affordable price point compared to some other supportive slip-on options
Cons: Skechers Foamies Arch Fit
- May not provide as much overall support and cushioning as more structured shoes
- Foam material can potentially break down quicker than other shoe materials
- Limited versatility – primarily suited for casual, indoor/light outdoor use
Pros: Crocs
- Extremely lightweight, comfortable, and easy to slip on/off
- Offer good water resistance and quick-drying properties
- Wide variety of colorful, distinctive styles and designs available
Cons: Crocs
- Some find the signature Crocs “clog” design to be unattractive or not suitable for all occasions
- While comfortable, the minimalist design may lack adequate arch support and stability for all-day wear
- Can squeak or make noise when walking on certain surfaces
Which Shoes Are Good for Different Activities
Shoes for Running
- Skechers Foamies Arch Fit: The Foamies Arch Fit, like the standard Foamies, are not designed for running. They have a very basic, flat sole construction that lacks the cushioning, stability, and support needed for running activities.
- Crocs: Crocs are also not suitable for running. Their signature clog-like design is intended for casual wear, not high-impact athletic pursuits.
Shoes for Walking
- Skechers Foamies Arch Fit: The Foamies Arch Fit offer slightly more support and comfort for walking compared to the standard Foamies, thanks to their built-in arch support feature. However, they still lack substantial cushioning.
- Crocs: Crocs can work reasonably well for casual, short-distance walking. Their lightweight, flexible design provides a basic level of comfort for light walking activities.
Shoes for Standing All Day
- Skechers Foamies Arch Fit: The Arch Fit feature in the Foamies line provides a bit more support and comfort for prolonged standing compared to the standard Foamies. However, they still lack the robust cushioning and support needed for all-day wear.
- Crocs: Crocs offer a decent level of comfort for standing all day, thanks to their signature Croslite material. The lightweight, cushioned design can help reduce foot fatigue during extended periods on your feet.
Now that you have an overview of Skechers Foamies Arch Fit vs Crocs differences, read on for an in-depth feature-by-feature comparison.
Cushioning Comparison
Let’s kick things off by analyzing the plush cushion comfort components built into Skechers Foamies Arch Fit versus standard Crocs clogs.
Inside Skechers Foamies Arch Fit Cushioning
- Air Cooled Memory Foam insoles
- Ultra Soft Faux Fur Fabric linings
- Flexible yet Supportive Arch Fit Design
What’s in Crocs Signature Foam Cushioning
- Ultra-soft, pressure-relieving CrosliteTM foam
- Heel cup comfort contours
- Textured massage-like footbed
As shown in the table below, both brands infuse premium foam into insoles and midsoles for exceptional softness underfoot.
However, Crocs leans more heavily into their proprietary CrosliteTM material spanning the entire outsole and footbed.
Skechers combines more mixed material elements like faux fur lining and supportive arch hugging.
| Cushioning Comparison | Skechers Foamies Arch Fit | Crocs |
| Cushioning Materials | Air Cooled Memory Foam | Proprietary CrosliteTM Foam |
| Interior Comfort Lining | Faux Fur Fabric | CrosliteTM Textured Footbed |
| Arch Support Method | Contoured Fit Design | Heel Cupping |
If you want the feeling of walking on clouds, Crocs may win outright for cushy softness from heel to toe. But the Skechers Arch Fit contoured design better accommodates foot conditions like plantar fasciitis.
Sizing & Fit Comparison
An ideally comfy clog still disappoints if sizing feels off or dimensions misalign from your feet. Let’s compare key size and shape variances when evaluating Skechers Foamies Arch Fit vs Classic Crocs.
How Skechers Foamies Arch Fit are Sized
- Tend to run large, consider sizing down
- Offered in whole sizes only
- Contoured arch-hugging shape
Crocs Size & Fit Overview
- Generally, run true to size
- Half sizes available
- Iconic roomy, boxy-toe box
While Crocs comes in more total size count options with half sizes, Skechers allows better customization through removable insoles and adjustable heel straps.
Crocs wins for more precise size matching while Skechers leaves wiggle room to fine-tune based on your variable needs.
| Size & Fit Comparison | Skechers Foamies Arch Fit | Crocs |
| Runs large or small? | Large, Size Down | True to Size |
| Half Sizes? | No | Yes |
| Customizable Fit | Removable Insoles, Adjustable Straps | Fixed Shape |
Determine your needs – if one foot falls between sizes, go to Crocs. Otherwise, Skechers works great.
Traction & Grip Comparison
Stable footing prevents embarrassing slips whether you’re hustling around the house or out running errands.
Let’s explore grip durability for Skechers Foamies Arch Fit versus Crocs clogs.
Skechers Foamies Traction Breakdown
- Multi-directional flex grooves
- Grippy synthetic rubber compound
- Ideal traction for casual, low-impact wear
How Crocs Outsoles Perform
- Non-marking CrosliteTM material
- Pivoting heel cups enhance control
- Okay traction is suitable for dry casual use
While Crocs offers decent dry grip thanks to strategic pivot placement at backs, Skechers outsoles with mapped grooves take the lead.
You May Also Like:
Skechers Foamies vs Native Shoes
Skechers also uses engineered rubber versus Croc proprietary CrosliteTM foam limiting wet environment suitability. For the best traction, Skechers wins.
| Outsole Traction Comparison | Skechers Foamies Arch Fit | Crocs |
| Outsole Material Used | Synthetic Rubber | CrosliteTM Foam |
| Pivot Points? | Flex Grooves | Heel Cups |
| Wet/Dry Usage Rating | Casual, Low-Impact Dry or Wet Environments | Casual Dry Environments |
Head outdoors on rainy days in Skechers over Crocs to prevent slips.
Durability & Longevity Comparison
The longer lasting your shoes are, the more cost value you obtain. Let’s overview durability factors impacting Skechers Foamies Arch Fit vs Classic Crocs.
How Skechers Foamies Hold Up
- Lightly reinforced stress areas
- Softer foam materials compress
- Average lifespan 6-12 months
Crocs Durability Expectations
- No additional reinforcement
- Proprietary resin retains bounce
- Average 12-24 month lifespan
As shown above, Croc’s proprietary CrosliteTM foam formula delivers impressively springy bounce-back wear after wear without losing integrity like softer generic foams over time.
This gives Crocs nearly double the usable wear lifespan versus Skechers. For extending value, Crocs triumphs for longevity.
| Durability Comparison Factors | Skechers Foamies Arch Fit | Crocs |
| Stress Point Reinforcement? | Light Placement | None |
| Material Bounce-Back | Foam Compresses Over Time | CrosliteTM Retains Shape |
| Estimated Lifespan | 6-12 Months | 12-24+ Months |
Go Crocs if you want comfort clogs that go the distance thanks to revolutionary cushioning compounds retaining plushness and pillowy comfort year after year.
Ventilation & Breathability Comparison
Proper airflow prevents sweaty, blister-prone feet during warm weather wear.
Let’s compare breathability built into Skechers Foamies Arch Fit and signature Crocs clogs.
Inside Skechers Foamies Arch Fit Breathability
- Air Cooled Memory Foam
- Ventilation ports at midsoles
- Open-back clog design
How Crocs Clogs Breath
- Ventilation ports across the footbed
- Ultra lightweight CrosliteTM foam
- Holes allow airflow
While both brands lean on holed or ported designs to improve ventilation, testers report Skechers Foamies have superior airflow keeping feet cooler and drier thanks to more holes concentrated around the insole perimeter.
Open or closed backs on Crocs alter air circulation drastically by comparison.
| Breathability Comparison | Skechers Foamies Arch Fit | Crocs |
| Circulation Boosting Materials | Air Cooled Memory Foam | CrosliteTM Lightweight Foam |
| Built-In Ventilation Method | Midsole Ports | Footbed Ports |
| Clog Back Style | Open Back | Open or Closed Options |
For maximized temperature regulation and moisture control, Skechers Foamies Arch Fit edges out Crocs models.
Price Comparison
With so many overlapping features between these two comfort brands, how do prices weigh in?
Let’s examine pricing points across Foamies Arch Fit versus Classic Crocs.
Skechers Foamies Arch Fit Price Points
- MSRP $50-$60
- Sales around $35-$45
- Frequent 40-50% discounts
Crocs Cost Considerations
- MSRP $50-$70
- Sales rarely lower than 25% off
- Limited-time discounts
Based on the value comparison table below, Skechers Foamies Arch Fit offers far more frequent and aggressive deals helping offset costs against comparably priced Crocs.
If you aren’t in a rush and can wait for sales, Skechers delivers better discount value.
| Cost & Value Comparison | Skechers Foamies Arch Fit | Crocs |
| MSRP Range | $50-$60 | $50-$70 |
| Sale Discount Percentage | 40-50% Off | 25% Off Max |
| Discount Frequency | Frequent | Rare |
Sign up for Skechers email lists to get the best low prices on Foamies Arch Fit clogs when comfort calls for less.
The Final Verdict:
Based on in-depth measurements, both Skechers Foamies Arch Fit and Classic Crocs deliver exceptional comfort embracing your feet in pillowy softness.
Which is ultimately best comes down to weighting your individual needs.
Skechers Foamies Arch Fit Ideal If:
- Seeking frequent sales & deals
- Want a more stylized look
- Need arch hugging support
Crocs Are Better If Wanting:
- Long term durability
- Simple classic aesthetic
- Ultimate plush cushioning
While Skechers offers more well-rounded versatility between style, savings, and adequate support, Crocs still can’t be beaten for lightweight all-day wearability thanks to proprietary foam retaining shape 2X as long as standard materials.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for plantar fasciitis or arch support?
With intentionally contoured arch-hugging cushion beds, Skechers Foamies Arch Fit targets common foot conditions like plantar fasciitis better through strategic design.
What provides better traction on wet or slippery floors?
Thanks to multi-directional flex grooves strategically carved into mapped zones, Skechers Foamies Arch Fit supplies superior wet/dry traction over Crocs classic clogs.
Which brand offers more sizing options?
While Skechers supplies a wider range of whole sizes, Crocs wins for offering half sizes ensuring more customers find that ‘just right’ Goldilocks fit.
What shoe looks more stylish?
Open or closed-back options paired with floral prints, stripes, and patterns give Skechers Foamies Arch Fit a more stylized look over Crocs’ classic clean, preppy silhouette.
I hope this detailed face-off has helped provide insight guiding your next comfort clog purchase! Let me know any other questions.
Share your love