Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 vs 3.0 – Comfort Clash!

Stepping into the realm of athletic footwear, the comparison between Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 and 3.0 presents an intriguing journey through evolution and enhancement in performance and comfort.

As successors in Skechers’ renowned Flex Appeal series, these models epitomize the brand’s commitment to continual innovation and refinement.

Exploring the differences between Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 vs 3.0 unveils a narrative of upgraded technologies, improved designs, and tailored features, catering to the diverse needs and preferences of active individuals seeking reliable footwear for their endeavors.

Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 vs 3.0

The main difference between Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 and 3.0 is that the 2.0 has a Memory Foam cushioned insole for comfort and a dual-density midsole for stability, while the 3.0 version uses Memory Foam in the midsole as well as the insole for consistent cushioning.

Both have shock-absorbing flexible soles, but the 2.0 prioritizes support with its firmer density bottom layer, whereas the 3.0 emphasizes plushness with more Memory Foam.

Before comparing the specifics, here is an overview of Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 vs 3.0 Shoes:

FeatureSkechers Flex Appeal 2.0Skechers Flex Appeal 3.0
OutsoleFlexible traction rubberMore flexible grooved traction rubber
MidsoleFlexSole shock absorbing midsoleFlexSole flexible midsole
UpperMesh fabric and synthetic leatherEngineered mesh fabric and synthetic overlays
InsoleMemory foam insertMemory foam insert
Ideal ForFitness walking, casual wearTravel, lightweight walking
WidthMedium or wideMedium only
Toe ShapeAlmond toeTapered rounded toe
Colors20+ bright color optionsMore neutral colorways

In summary, the Skechers Flex Appeal 3.0 has updates to the outsole, upper, and overall design to shave weight and increase flexibility compared to the 2.0. The 3.0 works well for traveling while the 2.0 focuses more on cushioned comfort during daily activities. The 2.0 comes in wider width sizes.

You May Also Like:
Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 vs 4.0

Pros and Cons

Pros: Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0

  • Affordable price point
  • Lightweight and flexible design
  • Offers decent comfort and support

Cons: Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0

  • Cushioning and support may be limited compared to more advanced models
  • Older model, so newer technologies may not be included
  • Limited color/style options

Pros: Skechers Flex Appeal 3.0

  • Updated design with modern style elements
  • Improved cushioning and support features
  • May provide better overall comfort and performance

Cons: Skechers Flex Appeal 3.0

  • Higher price point compared to the 2.0 version
  • Some users may prefer the simpler, more classic look of the 2.0
  • Newer model, so long-term durability is less proven

Which Shoes Are Good for Different Activities

Shoes for Running

  • Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0: The Flex Appeal 2.0 has a flexible, lightweight sole that provides moderate cushioning. It can handle light jogging and running, but may not offer enough support and shock absorption for more intense or longer-distance running.
  • Skechers Flex Appeal 3.0: The Flex Appeal 3.0 has an improved sole design with increased cushioning and flexibility. It can handle running better than the 2.0 version, making it suitable for light to moderate running sessions.

Shoes for Walking

  • Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0: The 2.0 version provides good comfort and support for everyday walking. Its flexible sole and mesh upper contribute to a comfortable walking experience.
  • Skechers Flex Appeal 3.0: The 3.0 version builds on the walking-focused features of the 2.0, with enhanced cushioning and support. This makes the Flex Appeal 3.0 an even better choice for longer walks and extended periods of walking.

Shoes for Standing All Day

  • Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0: The 2.0 model offers decent comfort and support for standing all day, thanks to its flexible yet supportive sole design.
  • Skechers Flex Appeal 3.0: The 3.0 version is the better option for prolonged standing. It has improved midsole cushioning and overall support features that help reduce foot fatigue and provide lasting comfort.

Now that you have an overview of Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 vs 3.0 Shoes differences, read on for an in-depth feature-by-feature comparison.

Flex Appeal Background

First, let’s briefly discuss the Flex Appeal franchise history and what makes this Skechers line such a top comfort pick year after year…

Skechers first introduced their original Flex Appeal training sneaker in Spring 2016 which quickly developed a cult following.

Fans loved the flexible Ultra Flex midsole and lightweight knit uppers moving naturally with your foot.

The brand then rolled out the Flex Appeal 1.5 in 2017 integrating pull loops on the heel for easy slip-on ability.

This was followed up by the Flex Appeal 2.0 in 2018 enhancing overall comfort and walkability.

The 2.0 edition upgraded to an Air Cooled Memory Foam insole and super soft fabric linings.

It expanded the collection with on-trend athletic leisure styling in colorful knits or smooth leather/woven textiles.

After the successful 2.0 series, Skechers looked at customer feedback to fine-tune the fit, traction, and technologies even further.

Thus the Flex Appeal 3.0 line launched in 2019 to rave reviews and quickly became my top suggestion for those needing maximum all-day cushioning.

Now let’s break down how the Flex Appeal 2.0 and 3.0 models specifically compare…

Cushioning Comfort Comparison

The largest differences between earlier Flex Appeal and the 3.0 editions come in the cushioning comfort technologies integrated. See the contrast in key features:

Comfort Technologies

Comfort TechFlex Appeal 2.0Flex Appeal 3.0
MidsoleUltra Flex high rebound midsoleUltra Flex high rebound midsole
InsoleAir Cooled Memory FoamAir Cooled Memory Foam
SocklinerRegular fabric sock linerAir Cooled Memory Foam sock liner
OutsoleFlex groove traction outsoleEnhanced traction w/ flex grooves
Moisture ControlModerate via fabricsImproved via Air Cooled Memory Foam

While both models offer the exceptionally responsive Ultra Flex midsole, the Flex Appeal 3.0 takes cushioning to the next level by integrating Air Cooled Memory Foam across BOTH the insole and sock liner.

This adapts to every contour of your foot for personalized comfort.

The 3.0 outsole also adds more targeted traction flex grooves and rubber pads ideal for all sorts of activities requiring both flexibility and grip.

So if your needs demand all-day standing, walking, or moderate-pace fitness, the Flex Appeal 3.0 performs fabulously. It won’t flatten out or lose bounce even after long hours.

But the 2.0 still utilizes quality Air Cooled Memory Foam insoles suiting most casual wear needs or basic exercise. So both editions deliver plush comfort tiers above most comparable athletic sneakers.

You May Also Like:
Skechers Flex Appeal 3.0 vs 4.0

Sizing and Fit Comparison

In addition to comfort factors, understanding the sizing and fit is also essential for finding your perfect Skechers Flex Appeal edition.

See how the 2.0 vs 3.0 models differ in key size and shape considerations:

Sizing and Fit Differences

Size/FitFlex Appeal 2.0Flex Appeal 3.0
Runs true to size?YesYes
Width OptionsMedium or wideMedium or wide
Toe Box ShapeTapered toe boxThe extra roomy toe box
Arch CateringLow to medium archesLow to high arches

True to Size Consistency

Fortunately, both editions remain consistent in running true to size once broken in for most feet. So ordering your typical athletic sneaker size is still reliable across both the 2.0 and 3.0 models.

Toe Box and Arch Variability

However, Skechers did adapt the shape and interior contours quite noticeably between iterations.

The Flex Appeal 3.0 fits a wider spectrum of foot shapes with a more generous roomy toe box and arches that flex from low to high.

Meanwhile, the 2.0 caters better to narrower feet needing a tapered athletic-leisure look. It securely captures low to medium arches without gapping or excess room.

So consider your foot proportions and arch type when deciding between the right Skechers Flex Appeal option.

Shoes too big or too small quickly become uncomfortable no matter how well-cushioned. Dialing in the ideal fit makes all the difference!

Style Selection and Colors Comparison

Along with comfort and sizing, the available styles and color varieties also attract customers to Skechers Flex Appeal editions. Let’s outline how the collections compare:

Style Choices

Style OptionsFlex Appeal 2.0Flex Appeal 3.0
Num. of Styles16+ styles25+ styles
TypesSneakers, casuals, sandalsSneakers, casuals, sandals, boots
Color SelectionMedium color varietyVery wide color range
Season SuitabilityMostly Spring/SummerYear-round including Fall/Winter

The Flex Appeal 3.0 still reigns supreme in overall selection offering 25+ unique style and color combinations spanning seasonal needs. The 2.0 focuses more on lighter slip-on sneakers or mules in brighter spring and summer looks.

So shoppers wanting max color/pattern options with variety covering year-round fashion needs should check out Flex Appeal 3.0 models first. But the core 2.0 line delivers stylish athletic casuals for fair-weather footwear needs on a budget.

Cost and Budget Comparison

With many newer features and technologies packed in, is the Skechers Flex Appeal 3.0 collection priced much higher than the 2.0 series?

See average prices within each line here:

Budget Pricing

CategoryFlex Appeal 2.0 PriceFlex Appeal 3.0 Price

Great news – despite the upgrades, the Flex Appeal 3.0 costs only around $5-$10 more on average compared to similar 2.0 categories and styles.

This keeps the latest models affordable for nearly any budget focused on quality, technology, and comfort built to last in sleek modern looks.

And many 2.0 colorways now hit sales around the $40-$50 price range during seasonal events for extra savings. So you can potentially invest in BOTH collections to mix and match or rotate shoes on heavy mileage days.

User Reviews and Rating

JenniferI love the Flex Appeal 2.0 shoes! The flexible mesh knit upper moves with my feet. The Air Cooled Memory Foam insole provides amazing cushioning for hours of comfort. Cute styles at an affordable price!⭐⭐⭐⭐✰
MarkThe Flex Appeal 3.0 shoes are so comfortable! I’m on my feet all day and these shoes provide great arch support. My feet never get tired thanks to the Air Cooled Memory Foam. Great quality for the price!⭐⭐⭐⭐✰
AmandaI’ve been wearing my Flex Appeal 2.0 shoes constantly! The Memory Foam insole molds perfectly to my feet and the cushioning lasts all day. Super lightweight and flexible. Worth every penny!⭐⭐⭐⭐✰
DavidI love the variety of fun colors and prints available in the Flex Appeal 3.0 line. The Memory Foam insole provides personalized comfort and support. My new go-to shoes for casual and active wear!⭐⭐⭐⭐✰
SusanThe Flex Appeal 2.0 shoes are my new favorite for workouts and running errands! The stretchy knit upper moves with my feet and the cushioning keeps me comfortable for miles. Great shock absorption too!⭐⭐⭐⭐✰

Price Comparison

Flex Appeal 2.0$50
Flex Appeal 3.0$60

The Best Choice Depends On Intended Use

So weighing all the differences and comparisons between Flex Appeal 2.0 vs 3.0 features – which shoe is ideal for YOU?

Here is how I guide customers in choosing the right edition for their scenarios:

Best FOR…

  • All-day wear – 3.0
  • Light activity and casual wear – 2.0
  • Narrower feet needing supportive tapered fit – 2.0
  • Maximum high rebound cushioning with roomy toe box – 3.0
  • Year-round style variety – 3.0
  • Bright colors/patterns on a budget – 2.0

As you can see, the Flex Appeal 3.0 works well for those requiring enhanced cushioning technologies and generously sized proportions for long-term comfort. Meanwhile, the 2.0 covers casual fashion needs at an affordable price point in fun warmer weather looks.


Deciding between Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 and Flex Appeal 3.0 shoes comes down to analyzing your style preferences and wear priorities.

The 2.0 line delivers quality traction and Memory Foam cushioning comfort across casual sneaker silhouettes on a budget.

But the 3.0 impresses me most for all-day mileage thanks to full Air Cooled Memory Foam coverage from sock liner to insole. It also offers greater year-round variety fitting more feet with a secure yet roomy feel.

For these reasons, I suggest the Skechers Flex Appeal 3.0 is the ideal choice for MOST shoppers needing a single go-to lifestyle athletic shoe balancing cost, technologies, appearance, and longevity.

Yet devoted 2.0 fans may still prefer the snugger tapered Euro look leaning towards flat styling rather than bulkier profiles. And you can’t go wrong saving $5-$15 choosing fun bright 2.0 colors for shorter-term fashion versatility on sale.

At the end of the day, assessing your priorities for size/shape needs, styling tastes, ideal performance, and budget determines if the Skechers Flex Appeal 2.0 or 3.0 better suits your lifestyle!

I hope this thorough edition comparison gave you all the details to feel confident picking YOUR perfect pair meeting both comfort and fashion needs with smile-inducing happiness step after step. Let me know if any other model questions come up during your decision journey!

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for work environments like healthcare or food service?

The Flex Appeal 3.0 has the edge for occupational comfort needs thanks to enhanced all-over Air Cooled Memory Foam cushioning. This fights fatigue and joint stress even after long shifts of extensive standing or walking on hard floors.

What is sizing like for wide feet? Do E widths exist?

Both the 2.0 and 3.0 models accommodate wide feet well in D/EE/EEE widths for women and E/EE/EEE options for men. However, 4E and 5E sizing does not currently exist across regular Flex Appeal athletic shoes. For that degree of wideness, I’d suggest exploring the Skechers Work line for maximum accommodation.

Do Skechers make steel-toe or slip-resistant Flex Appeal styles?

There are no steel toe or slip-resistant Flex Appeal models at this time. The collection focuses more on athletic leisure wearability rather than industrial job site protection. Again, Skechers Work safety shoes could be an alternative if they need occupational requirements beyond standard sneaker features.

Share your love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top